julio-alexi genao

Y'all remember our good friend, the utterly charming Elizabeth Llewellyn/Karen Hathaway Pittman? The author who bullied one reviewer into removing her review on GR and then resorted to racial slurs against another reviewer? The one who posts harassing comments on reviews on Amazon?

How could we forget her? Well, she has decided that she is the victim and her FB page has this posted:

Yee-ah and then if you go to the ABAB page:

Flagrant harassment-does not mean what Karen wants it to.

I've been reading about Chuck Wendig and how he's a gatekeeper on the kboards, or how he's chastising and saying awful things, and why should you care if anyone else produces dreck?

So I'll say what I've said from the start, which is if you don't care, neither do I.   I see many authors, self-published authors, who will not care about editing and say they can't afford editing, and also complain that people - people like me - don't give self-publishing authors much of a chance, if they give them a chance at all.  

I hear, 'just read the samples', 'what do you expect for ninety-nine cents or even three dollars', or some form of argument that amounts to me going through a slushpile that wouldn't make it past editors at publishing companies.   I'm not interested; I have better ways to spend my time, in fact, than reading hundreds of samples to find a well-edited, professional book when I can find that elsewhere.   

Or in other words, you can't have it both ways.   If you want me to consider self-publishing seriously, take your profession seriously.   The fact that so many authors are cheerleading mediocre, half-assed efforts only encourages me not to turn to self-published books for my reading needs.  

I've found some self-publishers who are amazing.   Talented, edited, professional, and even courteous.   But the majority do not fall into that category, and I am unwilling to put up with sifting through unedited manuscripts.   If you, as you claim, want more people to read self-edited books, then stop putting the onus on the readers.   Stop telling us it's our responsibility to make our way through the labyrinths of poorly edited, and unedited books, to find those.   Stop trying to shame us because we have books we know we like, published by a company that has minimum standards; you try to shame us by pointing at us and telling us we're not putting in the effort.   And therein lies your problem: for some of us, it's just so much of an effort to find anything that does meet those minimum standards in the self-publishing community.   Stop telling us that only the good books will survive, as clearly that is not the case because unedited manuscripts that read like the author knows english as a second or third language - to be generous - wrote it become bestsellers.  

If other people want to read that, want to waste their time searching for the diamonds in the rough, so be it.   I do not.   And I refuse to do it.   Not only that, horror of horrors, I refuse to be shamed for using my time wisely and sticking to what I like - from brilliant traditionally published books, to self-published books my friends with great taste recommend, to horrible monster-porn that makes me laugh it's so bad.  

I'm certainly not going to see the light of sampling all day long just because one more author who doesn't care about their product, and doesn't want to spend time or money editing their books, tells me that the samples exist.  I know.   I'm still not even sampling your books for a reason. 

i have just joined booklikes—and immediately set about importing all the thousands of books and reviews i've posted on goodreads.

sorry about the kruft in your timelines until the import process is over.

:-(